<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ClamFS 1.0.0 has been released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/</link>
	<description>Create. Break. Fix. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:08:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just gotten clamfs working on tinycore 4.1 after a bit of mucking around.

While testing with the eicar.com test virus file I discovered that I can not copy the test virus file to the mountpoint on the linux system, however I&#039;ve also setup a samba share to use the same mountpoint folder, and I can copy the test virus file to that share from a windows computer.

Suggestions welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just gotten clamfs working on tinycore 4.1 after a bit of mucking around.</p>
<p>While testing with the eicar.com test virus file I discovered that I can not copy the test virus file to the mountpoint on the linux system, however I&#8217;ve also setup a samba share to use the same mountpoint folder, and I can copy the test virus file to that share from a windows computer.</p>
<p>Suggestions welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan_at_uadm</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan_at_uadm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>Hi, have problem with connection to clamav:
14:16:52 (clamav.cxx:59) [tid:34389115328] attempt to open control connection to clamd via /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock
14:16:52 (clamav.cxx:63) [tid:34389115328] error: cannot connect to clamd
 my own DEBUG STRING 14:16:52 (clamav.cxx:63) [tid:34389115328] Try read error 12 (errConnectFailed)
14:16:52 (clamav.cxx:90) [tid:34389115328] closing clamd connection
14:16:52 (clamfs.cxx:1063) [tid:34389115328] cannot start without running clamd, make sure it work

at same time 
socat - UNIX-CONNECT:/var/run/clamav/clamd.sock
PING
PONG

work perfectly 
Using FreeBSD 8.2 amd64</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, have problem with connection to clamav:<br />
14:16:52 (clamav.cxx:59) [tid:34389115328] attempt to open control connection to clamd via /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock<br />
14:16:52 (clamav.cxx:63) [tid:34389115328] error: cannot connect to clamd<br />
 my own DEBUG STRING 14:16:52 (clamav.cxx:63) [tid:34389115328] Try read error 12 (errConnectFailed)<br />
14:16:52 (clamav.cxx:90) [tid:34389115328] closing clamd connection<br />
14:16:52 (clamfs.cxx:1063) [tid:34389115328] cannot start without running clamd, make sure it work</p>
<p>at same time<br />
socat &#8211; UNIX-CONNECT:/var/run/clamav/clamd.sock<br />
PING<br />
PONG</p>
<p>work perfectly<br />
Using FreeBSD 8.2 amd64</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Witam
Czy jest jakaś szansa/nadzieja na dodanie funkcji przesuwania plików do kwarantanny lub usuwania ? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Witam<br />
Czy jest jakaś szansa/nadzieja na dodanie funkcji przesuwania plików do kwarantanny lub usuwania ? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krzysztof Burghardt</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Krzysztof Burghardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Removing infected files automatically can be problematic in case of false positives. I plan to implement moving files to quarantine. You can always remove them by hand.

If you want to mount clamfs on /home, firstly mount your current /home into /home_unprotected. Finally set up clamfs with options:
&lt;code&gt;
&lt;filesystem root=&quot;/home_unprotected&quot; mountpoint=&quot;/home&quot; public=&quot;yes&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removing infected files automatically can be problematic in case of false positives. I plan to implement moving files to quarantine. You can always remove them by hand.</p>
<p>If you want to mount clamfs on /home, firstly mount your current /home into /home_unprotected. Finally set up clamfs with options:</p>
<div class="codecolorer-container text default" style="overflow:auto;white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #9F9F9F;width:435px;"><div class="text codecolorer" style="padding:5px;font:normal 12px/1.4em Monaco, Lucida Console, monospace;white-space:nowrap">&lt;filesystem root=&quot;/home_unprotected&quot; mountpoint=&quot;/home&quot; public=&quot;yes&quot; /&gt;</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Hello,
i&#039;m trying to make work this solution wich seems to be very usefull
the problem i meet is that i dont know how to remove infected file
the clamd conf file doesnt permit remove infected file and clamf.xml no more
what could be the solution to remove infected file when it&#039;s found

Another question from newbie i&#039;m :  i plan use clamfs with samba, does that mean that the &quot;new&quot; home directory of a user is the clamfs one ?
i mean, if before the home directory of toto was /home/toto, if i configure clamfs to mount /home on /home-clamfs-home the &quot;new&quot; home directory of toto will be /home-clamfs/toto ?


thanks for your answers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
i&#8217;m trying to make work this solution wich seems to be very usefull<br />
the problem i meet is that i dont know how to remove infected file<br />
the clamd conf file doesnt permit remove infected file and clamf.xml no more<br />
what could be the solution to remove infected file when it&#8217;s found</p>
<p>Another question from newbie i&#8217;m :  i plan use clamfs with samba, does that mean that the &#8220;new&#8221; home directory of a user is the clamfs one ?<br />
i mean, if before the home directory of toto was /home/toto, if i configure clamfs to mount /home on /home-clamfs-home the &#8220;new&#8221; home directory of toto will be /home-clamfs/toto ?</p>
<p>thanks for your answers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krzysztof Burghardt</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Krzysztof Burghardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-275</guid>
		<description>Poprawka wejdzie oczywiście do najbliższego wydania, ale nie mogę zagwarantować, że nastąpi ono szybko. Jako tymczasowe rozwiązanie polecam patcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poprawka wejdzie oczywiście do najbliższego wydania, ale nie mogę zagwarantować, że nastąpi ono szybko. Jako tymczasowe rozwiązanie polecam patcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miro</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>miro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Dzięki za info!
To jeszcze szybkie pytanie, planujesz zapakowanie tego w wersję np. 1.0.1? Czy po prostu mam zrobić patcha, który będzie nakładany przez ebuilda (aż do wyjścia kolejnej wersji) ?
Pozdrawiam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dzięki za info!<br />
To jeszcze szybkie pytanie, planujesz zapakowanie tego w wersję np. 1.0.1? Czy po prostu mam zrobić patcha, który będzie nakładany przez ebuilda (aż do wyjścia kolejnej wersji) ?<br />
Pozdrawiam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krzysztof Burghardt</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Krzysztof Burghardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Poprawka znajduje się już w &lt;a href=&quot;http://clamfs.svn.sourceforge.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;repozytorium SVN&lt;/a&gt; jako &lt;a href=&quot;http://clamfs.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/clamfs?view=rev&amp;revision=85&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wersja r85&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poprawka znajduje się już w <a href="http://clamfs.svn.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">repozytorium SVN</a> jako <a href="http://clamfs.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/clamfs?view=rev&#038;revision=85" rel="nofollow">wersja r85</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miro</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>miro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Cześć!
Mam problem z kompilacją clamfs, gcc 4.4.2:

clamfs.cxx: In function &#039;char* clamfs::fixpath(const char*)&#039;:
clamfs.cxx:88: warning: ignoring return value of &#039;int fchdir(int)&#039;, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
clamfs.cxx: In function &#039;int clamfs::clamfs_open(const char*, fuse_file_info*)&#039;:
clamfs.cxx:529: error: invalid conversion from &#039;const char*&#039; to &#039;char*&#039;
make[2]: *** [clamfs.o] Błąd 1
make[2]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/clamfs-1.0.0/work/clamfs-1.0.0/src&#039;
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Błąd 1
make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/clamfs-1.0.0/work/clamfs-1.0.0&#039;
make: *** [all] Błąd 2

Czy istnieje szansa na wersję poprawkową? ;)
Pozdrawiam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cześć!<br />
Mam problem z kompilacją clamfs, gcc 4.4.2:</p>
<p>clamfs.cxx: In function &#8216;char* clamfs::fixpath(const char*)&#8217;:<br />
clamfs.cxx:88: warning: ignoring return value of &#8216;int fchdir(int)&#8217;, declared with attribute warn_unused_result<br />
clamfs.cxx: In function &#8216;int clamfs::clamfs_open(const char*, fuse_file_info*)&#8217;:<br />
clamfs.cxx:529: error: invalid conversion from &#8216;const char*&#8217; to &#8216;char*&#8217;<br />
make[2]: *** [clamfs.o] Błąd 1<br />
make[2]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/clamfs-1.0.0/work/clamfs-1.0.0/src&#8217;<br />
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Błąd 1<br />
make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/clamfs-1.0.0/work/clamfs-1.0.0&#8242;<br />
make: *** [all] Błąd 2</p>
<p>Czy istnieje szansa na wersję poprawkową? ;)<br />
Pozdrawiam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Dreyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.burghardt.pl/2009/02/clamfs-100-has-been-released/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Dreyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burghardt.pl/?p=273#comment-271</guid>
		<description>first of all: a very impressive tool!

after a few days of use i noticed, that it does not respect setgid directories.

i have a directory named &quot;files&quot;:
$ ls -ld files
drwxrws--- 2 sven localusers 4096 14. Aug 16:51 files

if i touch a file in there (as root)...
# touch testfile

...it should look like this:
$ ls -l testfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 root localusers 0 14. Aug 16:54 foo

but in fact, it looks like this:
$ ls -l testfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 14. Aug 16:54 foo

the setgid-flag for the directory is ignored. if i try it outside a clamfs-directory, it works.

am i missing a configuration option or is this a bug in fuse or clamfs?

regards,
sven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first of all: a very impressive tool!</p>
<p>after a few days of use i noticed, that it does not respect setgid directories.</p>
<p>i have a directory named &#8220;files&#8221;:<br />
$ ls -ld files<br />
drwxrws&#8212; 2 sven localusers 4096 14. Aug 16:51 files</p>
<p>if i touch a file in there (as root)&#8230;<br />
# touch testfile</p>
<p>&#8230;it should look like this:<br />
$ ls -l testfile<br />
-rw-r&#8211;r&#8211; 1 root localusers 0 14. Aug 16:54 foo</p>
<p>but in fact, it looks like this:<br />
$ ls -l testfile<br />
-rw-r&#8211;r&#8211; 1 root root 0 14. Aug 16:54 foo</p>
<p>the setgid-flag for the directory is ignored. if i try it outside a clamfs-directory, it works.</p>
<p>am i missing a configuration option or is this a bug in fuse or clamfs?</p>
<p>regards,<br />
sven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

